The biggest complication we had when creating the shot list,
storyboard and script is that there wasn't much communication between us and
this made it difficult to create a shot list without knowing what was in the
storyboard. Nevertheless, the storyboard, script and shot list turned out okay
and seemed to work well when filming but for next time we'll have to
communicate more when creating the thing we need for post-production. Also, the
preproduction should be completed and uploaded to all of our blogs sooner
rather than later just to avoid the hassle of doing it after.
Strengths:
Everybody had a role to play in the making
of the clip; actor or director and it was helpful having four people in the
group because this made the whole process a lot quicker and a more efficient
use of our time. Also, the plot to the film was good and along I believe with
were within the conventions of an interrogation clip but also had an element of
comedy and kept it within the 21st century and people laughed so we hope that’s
a good sign. Also, the music played at the beginning suited the film really
well and added to the suspense as to why the person was there and added to the
seriousness of the situation which turned out to be not so serious.
Furthermore, the man behind the mirror worked well as an enigma code as the
audience had to guess what was going to happen next. We also importantly stuck
to the 180 degree rule which made the film look more professional.
Weaknesses:
Our greatest demise was the lighting, although it seemed to be
bright when recording and when it played on the ‘vlc’ player was too dark at
some points to see what was going on. Despite the darkness and the solitary
lamp fulfilling the criteria of an interrogation it was notably too dark and
this is something we’ll have to consider for next time. Moreover, one or two of
the cuts were of poor quality and didn’t look up to standard, so before we
shoot and edit the next film I’ll have to play around with the editor to get
accustomed to it. Furthermore, the framing could have been better as the
audience didn’t really get a chance to identify with the characters as their
faces weren’t clearly shown and too much of the background was instead.
For our production the mise-en-scene could be changes because we
need to take lighting into more consideration when filming. The props that were
used worked well especially with the already cracked phone and the (not so)
serious interrogation tool. The setting was also good as we were able to use
the false mirror looking onto a dark room. Sound was also used well as it was
clearly heard. However, the attention to detail could have been better as the CCTV
template was photo shopped instead of moving with time. The cinematography was
also good because we had a wide range of shoots with the security camera shot
working well with the conventions of an interrogation.